An Ibis On The Nightstand

…and a merganser on the headboard

Look, kids, it’s a new poll!

This is not the final list of ideas for a title, but it’s a start.

Advertisements

148 comments on “An Ibis On The Nightstand

  1. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  2. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  3. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  4. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  5. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  6. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  7. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  8. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  9. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  10. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  11. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  12. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  13. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  14. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  15. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  16. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  17. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  18. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  19. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  20. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  21. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  22. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  23. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  24. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  25. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  26. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  27. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  28. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  29. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  30. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  31. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  32. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  33. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  34. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  35. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  36. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  37. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  38. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  39. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  40. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  41. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  42. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  43. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  44. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  45. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  46. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  47. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  48. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  49. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  50. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  51. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  52. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  53. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  54. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  55. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  56. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  57. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  58. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  59. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  60. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  61. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  62. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  63. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  64. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  65. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  66. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  67. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  68. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  69. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  70. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  71. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  72. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  73. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

  74. I did not click an answer to the second question but here is my opinion: only if it’s both really obvious that the column is fake AND the column is really funny. But you can get into a lot of annoyance with people who misunderstand the context. I would not be too worried about legal action (everyone is too poor in the gaming world), but more about just protracted, idiotic arguments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s